Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Lawrence Bataljin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ugo Carabelli vs L. Bataljin

Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
29
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
5'6" (168 cm)
50
C. Rank
0
43
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$595.1K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Lawrence Bataljin
AUS
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
29
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
5'6" (168 cm)
50
C. Rank
0
43
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$595.1K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Bataljin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 2 and Lawrence Bataljin winning 0. The last match between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Lawrence Bataljin was at the Turkey F27, 07-07-2016, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Carabelli | 1 |
Bataljin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Turkey F27(07-07-16)
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
6
6
Lawrence Bataljin
2
0
C. U. Carabelli vs L. Bataljin H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$595,100 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
62.64% (379-226) | Career Total W/L | 42.08% (162-223) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
12 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
45.00% (18-22) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. U. Carabelli vs L. Bataljin Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Camilo Ugo Carabelli has won 46.21% of points on their second serve, while Lawrence Bataljin has won 43.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Camilo Ugo Carabelli, in recent form, has won 45.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lawrence Bataljin has won 50.00%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.37% and 33.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Camilo Ugo Carabelli has saved 59.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lawrence Bataljin has saved 52.30% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Camilo Ugo Carabelli has won 59.46% of matches played (W/L 44/30), with Lawrence Bataljin winning 29.79% (W/L 14/33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Camilo Ugo Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 341/184), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/5). Lawrence Bataljin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 98/119), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 2/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Camilo Ugo Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 22/6), where as Lawrence Bataljin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 30.23% of matches (W/L 13/30). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 1 times and Lawrence Bataljin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 2 and Lawrence Bataljin winning 0.
- The last match between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Lawrence Bataljin was at the Turkey F27, 07-07-2016, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Camilo Ugo Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 149.41 while Lawrence Bataljin has played against players with an average rank of 243.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Camilo Ugo Carabelli has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lawrence Bataljin has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Camilo Ugo Carabelli has converted 28.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lawrence Bataljin has converted 43.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Lawrence Bataljin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. U. Carabelli vs L. Bataljin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 2 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:5:0 | Average Match Time | 1:5:0 |
63% (30/48) | 1st Serve % | 80% (37/46) |
67% (20/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (14/37) |
44% (8/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 11% (1/9) |
58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
67% (31/46) | Return Points Win % | 42% (20/48) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Carabelli 49%, Bataljin 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Carabelli 51%, Bataljin 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Carabelli 60%, Bataljin 53%.
C. U. Carabelli Recent Matches Played
L. Bataljin Recent Matches Played

C. U. Carabelli vs L. Bataljin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62.64% (379/226) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.08% (162/223) |
59.37% (830/568) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.92% (370/492) |
53.64% (6938/5996) | Games Win/Loss | 47.52% (3752/4143) |
50.68% (37/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.16% (98/119) |
64.95% (341/184) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.85% (61/96) |
50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
0.00% (0/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (2/6) |
0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
1132 | Aces Total | 111 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
1348 | Total Double Faults | 341 |
1:41:24 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
372.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 259.42 |
62% (24329/39309) | 1st Serve % | 68% (5725/8450) |
66% (16131/24329) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (3226/5725) |
50% (7421/14979) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1183/2725) |
45% (2052/4559) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (337/784) |
43% (17034/39842) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3282/8319) |
36.36% (8/14) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
40.91% (9/13) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
49.06% (26/27) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
65.52% (190/100) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (9/18) |
66.97% (146/72) | Futures W/L | 42.74% (153/205) |
63% (367/579) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (160/380) |
44% (7/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
53% (82/154) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (25/53) |
60% (109/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (49/97) |
89% (348/310) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (156/130) |
10% (348/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (156/26) |
26% (256/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (229/32) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:00 AM 14/10/25
PredictionW1
2.64
W2
1.48
11:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
1.28
W2
3.44
12:00 PM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
1.63
W2
2.27
12:00 PM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
1.81
W2
1.92
08:00 AM 14/10/25
PredictionW1
1.43
W2
2.81
10:05 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
2.08
W2
1.69
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Carabelli (BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm)
Zeppieri vs CarabelliCould play in The Quarterfinals
Berrettini vs CarabelliCould play in The Quarterfinals
Humbert vs CarabelliCould play in The Quarterfinals
Sonego vs CarabelliCould play in The Second
Fery vs CarabelliCould play in The Second
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
05:30
H2H 1-2
09:00
H2H 2-0
14:00
H2H 0-2
18:00
H2H 1-1
11:00
H2H 0-2
Tennis Events This Week
Almaty Open - Almaty
Kazakhstan
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm
Sweden
European Open - Brussels
Belgium
Curitiba Challenger
Brazil
Hersonissos 6 Challenger
Greece
Lincoln Challenger
United States
Olbia Challenger
Italy
Shenzhen Challenger
China
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Offenbach
Germany
M25 Kigali
Rwanda
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy